law

HOW TO…reduce your legal bill!

Posted on by thelegalknow

squirrel-eating-peanuts-300x210

A legally smart business woman asked me to write a post about how to reduce her legal bill. As a City lawyer, here are my best tips on how to get the most out of your lawyer for less!

  1. Give legally smart instructions – Of course I would start with this one! The smarter your instructions the sooner your lawyer can get to work; they don’t have to waste billable time trying to figure out what you want. For example compare “Hey Cara please can you draft us a contract to buy apples from Fruit Ltd on a weekly basis” to “Hey Cara please can you draft us a contract to buy apples from Fruit Ltd on a weekly basis for X amount per box. In each box there will be X apples. We want the contract to last for a year with a right of renewal and we want it to be governed by English law and the English courts have jurisdiction. We also need a clause that states we have a right to terminate if the apples are Y. Delivery should be on Y of each week….” The former encourages a huge bill, the latter demands an efficient bill.
  2. Ask a junior lawyer to do it – Unless you are giving a complex instruction there is no reason why a junior lawyer should not be doing the bulk of the work. A senior lawyer only needs to give it a once over to make sure there are no glaring mistakes. When you give a standard instruction request for a junior lawyer to do the work in the first instance, if the law firm insists that a more senior lawyer is needed ask WHY and make them JUSTIFY the senior lawyer’s input BEFORE any work is carried out. You may just find that they back down.
  3. Request to see the narratives – Lawyers bill by an hourly rate. As part of that billing structure we are required to write narratives. If your lawyer has spent 7 hours reviewing a contract, ask to see the narratives. They should be detailed enough for you to say “fair enough” BUT if the narratives do not convince you, challenge the bill! This will either a) get you a discount on that very same bill or b) get you a fairer bill next time because that lawyer, terrified, will work as efficiently as possible for you. Most lawyers get annoyed when a client asks to see the narratives BUT its YOUR money and when you’re a growing business every penny counts!
  4. Agree a fixed fee structure – If you prefer predictability, agree a fixed fee arrangement! This means that, unless something unexpected pops up in the process, you know exactly how much you are paying each time. For example, if you have a standard sale contract that your lawyer reviews every time you engage with a new customer, agree a fixed fee for this repeat review i.e £50 per contract. You can also agree a fixed fee for a one off instruction. For example, if you need a lawyer to attend a negotiation with you, ask them to do it for X amount and not by an hourly rate. Hint to the lawyer that if they agree to this, you will send other work their way and watch your proposal be snapped up! Lawyers care more about a longterm business relationship in which they receive frequent work than being able to bill full rates on a single occasion.

Now go read “5 ways to spot a bad lawyer” and “3 ways to get the most out of your lawyer” to learn how to get even more out of your lawyer!

Please like and please share. Also sign up to get alerts for my posts. If you would like me to write anything in particular, please drop me an email in the contact tab.

Advertisement

Beware the Double D’s – Directors’ Duties!

Posted on by thelegalknow


If you are a director of a UK company that is a big deal. To whom much is given much is EXPECTED and the Companies Act 2006 did not forget about this! Shareholders of a company delegate the day-to-day management of the company to the directors so EFFECTIVELY the directors ARE the company. This is why the law has prescribed certain expectations for directors.

BASIC POWERS

Firstly, let’s ensure that you understand the basic power and authority of directors.

Directors work as a board (basically a team). The BOARD OF DIRECTORS may (if the articles of association permit, as they generally will) delegate powers to a committee of board members (sub team) or to an individual director (so this individual director can make particular decisions without referring to the board).

An EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR is an employee (of the company) with specific powers delegated to them either by a resolution (decision) of the board or under their service contracts.

A NON-EXECUTIVE director is, as the name implies, a director to whom no executive powers have been granted by the board. HOWEVER they can VOTE at board meetings and still have the same duties as executive directors. A non-executive director is usually an expert of some sort who acts as a check on the executive directors by using their particular expertise to vote at board meetings.

A MANAGING DIRECTOR (sometimes called a chief executive) is granted more extensive executive powers by the company’s articles of association or by board resolution. As the name suggests,  a managing director manages the other directors.

IF you are a director, you should know and understand the extent of your powers within your company or else you could fall foul of an array of liability. The golden rule is to never act beyond your powers. Take any issues to the board if you are unsure.

STATUTORY DUTIES

As stated in my previous post, the Companies Act 2006 is really your wikipedia for UK Company Law and it is a great start for understanding your role as a director. A director’s general duties are owed to the company and NOT to the individual shareholders. It is the company that will have the right of action against a director if he or she misuses their position.

The Companies Act 2006 codifies certain key duties, as follows:

  1. Duty to act within powers (section 171);
  2. Duty to promote the success of the company (section 172);
  3. Duty to exercise independent judgment (section 173);
  4. Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence (section 174);
  5. Duty to avoid conflicts of interest (section 175);
  6. Duty not to accept benefits from third parties (section 176); and
  7. Duty to declare interest in proposed transaction or arrangement (sections 177 to 185).

All of the above are designed to prevent directors abusing the position they hold within a company. Some of them may seem pretty obvious but you’d be surprised! Parliament didn’t pass the Company Directors’ Disqualification Act 1986 for nothing! In my experience, directors generally tend to fail to understand the restraints of 6 and 7 (go read these sections).

CODE OF CONDUCT

Alongside the statutory duties there is also what is known as the ‘code of conduct’ for directors. These include but are not limited to:

  • The likely consequence of any decision in the long term – so you have to demonstrate that you have thought about the future impact of your decisions for the company;
  • The interests of the company’s employees;
  • The need to act fairly as between members of the company; and
  • The impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment.

Basically, directors have a lot to consider when they act. WHY should you CARE? Well sadly, directors are personally liable if they fail to comply with their duties. PERSONALLY (urgh) AND a director can even face criminal charges. That said, if you are a director, you can protect yourself by always taking difficult decisions to the board – you know, a problem shared is a problem halved…BUT if you ALONE are the board, it is important to document WHY you make a particular decision, to demonstrate that you have considered the code of conduct and the statutory duties.

Please like and please share!

Introducing the Companies Act 2006

Posted on by thelegalknow


If you are a UK company, the Companies Act 2006 is the main piece of legislation that GOVERNS YOU in the UK.

With approximately 1,300 sections, the Companies Act 2006 was passed in order to modernise and simplify company law, codify directors’ duties, grant improved rights to shareholders and simplify the administrative burden carried by UK companies. It is basically your “go to” for all things company law! Although some lawyers criticise it for being too detailed and trying to cover every eventuality, I actually kind of like it! You can navigate it relatively easily and well, it’s all there! SO if you have a UK company and are at a loss with UK Company Law, the Companies Act 2006 is a good resource to turn to. You can access it right HERE for FREE.

So what can you look forward to educating yourself about in the Companies Act 2006? Well, amongst many (many, many, many – it is the longest piece of legislation in the UK) other things, it sets out the following:

1. a company’s formation (modernised to facilitate incorporation over the Internet…so er…what are you waiting for?);

2. a company’s duties including those that can be fulfilled electronically (YES, so much easier);

3. a company’s communications with its shareholders (this can be done electronically via a website – again, way EASIER);

4. directors’ duties (codified for the first time) including an obligation to promote the success of the company (yup you are OBLIGED to do this by  English LAW), to consider the community and the environment (this is CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY), the interests of employees, and to be fair to shareholders (this is arguably why Google restructured its business);

5. the rights of indirect shareholders, including the right to sue the company’s director(s) if fraud or negligence is suspected;

6. company naming rules and company governance e.g. limited companies are no longer required to have a company secretary, and can be run by one director;

7. company ‘model’ Articles of Association, provided by Companies House (this is your company’s CONSTITUTION);

8. share capital rules (simplified for private companies); and

9. formalities for execution of documents.

This epic piece of legislation may be very detailed and a bit daunting at first BUT I think it is incredibly useful – it is basically Wikipedia for UK Company Law. If you have a query about your company and its operations, skim through the index of the Companies Act 2006 and see what you can find out THEN follow up with your lawyer IF you have to!

Please like and please share!

Read the SMALL print

Posted on by thelegalknow


Yup! It’s as simple as that. Read the small print! Read the disclaimers (this blog has one). Read the exclusion clauses. Read the terms and conditions.

I get so annoyed when I see companies or blogs or ANYTHING referring to the small print as “legal mumbo jumbo”. I can assure you that the small print it is NOT mumbo jumbo. It is a coherent stream of dos and don’ts that could NEGATIVELY affect your business – the SMALL print can have BIG consequences!

So do yourself a favour and take the time to read and understand the small print. Ask questions too! If you see something you don’t like, can you get a waiver? Can you negotiate out of it? Or maybe it’s not worth going ahead with at all? Again, reading and understanding contracts, offers etc gives your business options.

Please like and please share!

Before you sign: Termination

Posted on by thelegalknow

exit 2

In continuation of the “Before you sign” series, I present the third potentially deadly clause for your review…TERMINATION. A termination clause is effectively your get out of jail FREE card in any contract so long as you DRAFT it that way. This is why you need to understand your contract so that you know a) what you want (life is good and business continues as normal) and b) what you do not want (often that the deal has soured and you need to end it). Termination clauses set out WHEN either party can LAWFULLY terminate the contract. The consequence of UNLAWFULLY (so not complying with the termination clause) terminating the contract is that you are most likely sued by the other party/parties to the contract for damages (compensation).

There are different circumstances in which you may want to terminate a contract. You may just want to try out a business relationship and give yourself the option to walk away if you don’t think there is a future in it. In this instance your termination clause should specifically enable you to end the contract on a short period of notice, for example 3 months after a fixed initial period of 6 months – this is termination for convenience or “without cause”. Either party can walk away after a set period of time simply because you have given each other the opportunity to do so. Of course it is also possible for a contract to just end naturally for example by effluxion of time (the contract runs its term), or by both parties performing their obligations under the contract. For example A contracts with B for delivery of 70 tennis balls on X date in return for A paying B a fee, once B delivers the 70 tennis balls in accordance with the contract and A pays B, the contract is over.

HOWEVER more likely than not you will want to make sure that you can terminate the contract when the other party BREACHES (messes up) the contract. Here are some examples of when that might be:

  1. The other party has committed a MATERIAL breach of the contract that CANNOT be remedied – so this is when you receive something SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT from what the contract specified, for example, if the contract specifies the sale of a box of tennis balls and you as the buyer receive a box of footballs. Or you hire an artist to perform the piano at your event but they turn up with a guitar. Such a fundamental breach should entitle you to terminate the contract immediately without notice to the other party. 
  2. The other party has committed a MATERIAL/SUBSTANTIAL breach of the contract that is capable of being remedied but has failed to remedy that breach within a set period of time – so this is when the other party has breached the contract AND the breach is fixable HOWEVER the other party has  failed to fix it within the set period of time. In such circumstances you will want the right to terminate the contract. For example you order pink balloons and the other party delivers blue balloons. You still have balloons but they’re not the right colour, you will notify the other party giving them a chance to send you the correct colour balloons by a certain time in accordance with the contract (say 7 days). The other party fails to send the correct balloons by your deadline OR sends white balloons. You will want to terminate the contract and sue for damages. Please also note that even where a failing party manages to remedy its material breach within a set period of time, the innocent party could still seek damages for any loss caused by the breach. For example You have a restaurant that requires 100 burgers and 100 hot dogs but you only receive a delivery of 70 burgers and 70 hot dogs from your supplier. By the time your supplier has delivered the remaining 30 burgers and 30 hot dogs, you’ve missed out on business or you’ve had to buy more expensive burgers and hot dogs at short notice from another supplier to meet the demand of your customers. You will want to sue for the loss you suffered during this time even if you continue the contract with your original supplier.
  1. The other party persistently breaches the contract in MINOR ways which altogether have a negative impact on the performance of the contract E.G continuously delivering goods late, being late with services without a reasonable excuse, persistently making late payments (this can affect cash flow) or continuously failing to meet sales targets or sales quotas within a period of time. You will want the right to pull the plug on the contract after a while. It will be up to you to determine, in your contract, when enough is enough in respect of these minor breaches. For example you would not want to terminate the contract for one late payment but you might want to terminate it for three consecutive late payments.
  2. The other party has become insolvent or bankrupt or is in the process of becoming so – the other party has gone bust or is clearly in financial trouble. You will really want to get out of the contract in this situation so you must make sure that your contract allows you to do so.
  3. You anticipate that the other party is about to breach the contract (an anticipatory breach) – so this is where the other party has made it known that they will not be carrying out the agreed work or they effectively stop acting in accordance with the contract, leading the other party to believe that they have no intention of fulfilling their part of the agreement. For example the other party persistently fails to produce an ordered item or refuses to accept payment. You will want to end the contract and sue for damages WITHOUT WAITING for the actual breach to occur.

Termination clauses are complex and this is where you really need a lawyer’s help. If you do not expressly make provisions in your contract for the different scenarios in which you want to terminate the contract, your contract will be subject to common law (this is the case in the UK but check the consequence in your country). Common law is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals that decide individual cases. If you leave your contract to the mercy of common law you could end up spending heaps of money paying lawyers to work out which case law applies to your particular contract’s circumstances and then even more money when the other side says your application of the common law is wrong and takes you to court! 

Basically, ALWAYS make express provision in your contract as to when it can be terminated.

Please like and please share!

Before you sign: Jurisdiction and Governing Law

Posted on by thelegalknow

jurisdiction

There are a number of things that you should check out before you sign ANY contract however what I’m about to tell you is arguably one of the most important. When your business is doing well and the profits are booming, it’s hard to think about what happens if things go wrong between you and your client or you and your supplier. Well, regardless, lawyers go straight to the back of a contract to look at WHERE the parties battle it out if a lawsuit arises and WHICH LAW governs that battle. This is captured in each of the jurisdiction (WHERE) and governing law (WHICH) clauses. This post considers a UK law perspective however, jurisdiction and governing law are universal concepts (pretty much) so please look up your country’s equivalent.

Jurisdiction determines which country’s courts will hear any claim that is brought under the contract.  Governing law is the law that will be applied by the courts to interpret each party’s rights and obligations under the contract.  The two do not have to match, so for example the English courts could hear a dispute arising from a contract and apply French law to determine the outcome of the dispute. However, whilst the English courts are experienced in applying foreign laws, the French law must be PROVEN as a fact, usually by witness evidence from a qualified French lawyer. You can see how the costs can easily wrack up, witness evidence from a lawyer! Oh the fees! This is why lawyers tend to recommend that the jurisdiction and the governing law are the SAME to avoid uncertainty and to avoid the unnecessary costs of hiring lawyers as expert witnesses on top of hiring lawyers to actually represent you at court!

The jurisdiction and governing law clauses should be considered and agreed from the outset. You do not want to get to the point of suing or being sued only to learn that despite your business being domiciled and operating in the UK, you are having to fly all the way to Singapore because the other side snuck in a jurisdiction clause that the contract would be subject to the courts of Singapore and a governing law clause that the contract would be interpreted in accordance with Singapore Law. NIGHTMARE.

It is possible to draft one joint jurisdiction and governing law clause however contracts that want to be easily understood (hint hint) set the clauses out separately.

Here is an example of a governing law clause:

This agreement and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of England and Wales.

Here is an example of a jurisdiction clause:

Each party irrevocably agrees that the courts of England and Wales shall have [exclusive/non-exclusive] jurisdiction to settle any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with this agreement or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims). Note: You can choose to submit the contract to just one country’s courts (exclusive jurisdiction) OR you can choose to allow the parties to commence proceedings in another country’s courts DESPITE stating a particular country in the contract (non-exclusive jurisdiction, this is very confusing and is usually only used in special circumstances).

I must tell you that jurisdiction can either be given to a country’s national courts (as above) OR to arbitration proceedings in an arbitration clause. Arbitration is similar to court proceedings but it is less formal and the parties effectively decide the rules that govern the process. It is also confidential (good for keeping high profile disputes out of the public). If you choose to use arbitration instead of court proceedings, governing law is still required. Arbitration is definitely a topic for another post, in fact many other posts, but for now just know that the option is there. So, with this knowledge, go review your contracts and ask your lawyers questions!

Please like and please share!

Be smart but don’t cheat…

Posted on by thelegalknow

fox.jpg

There is a reason why mega successful businesses spend thousands, sometimes millions of pounds/dollars on legal advice. I cannot tell you the number of times that I have almost cried because a client has brought me a problem that could have easily been avoided IF legal advice had been sought in the first place. In the long term, getting proper legal advice could save you so much MONEY and isn’t that what it’s all about – MONEY? You know that saying, what’s worth doing at all is worth doing well…it’s said for a reason! I don’t feel good billing you for my time when it’s for an issue that really shouldn’t have ever become an issue!

Think of it this way, when you have a tooth ache you go to a dentist -you don’t pull out the tooth yourself. When you feel sick you go to a doctor you don’t diagnose yourself. SO, if you need a contract drafted, guess what, you DON’T do it yourself. You go to your lawyer! You should be focusing all your energy into your product/service/idea not struggling to draft a 30 page contract or represent yourself at Court.

So what am I saying? I’m saying be smart BUT don’t cheat.

I am a lawyer and it took me 6 years of training to qualify to be one (a 3 year degree, a 1 year professional practice qualification and a 2 year training contract at an international law firm in the City). You cannot read this blog and become a lawyer BUT you CAN read this blog and become legally smart so that when you seek proper legal advice you are not doing so blindly. You are firing out questions and demanding the best service possible!

It’s quite simple, do things properly at the outset and you will reap the rewards later.

Please like and please share!

Who are you in business with?

Posted on by thelegalknow

Suspicious Package

Not all that glitters is gold, but sometimes if you want your business to grow you have to take risks, even if the glitter turns out to be coal. HOWEVER never risk who you do business with! It isn’t worth it. All it takes is one bad business partner or one bad supplier to tarnish your brand or disrupt your product/service/idea. This is why I advise my clients to always verify (investigate and confirm) the entities they contract with. When a company/person says they are something or they are someone NEVER take their word for it, always check them out yourself. Business is about money and money attracts all sorts of wannabe Warren Buffets with an abundance of international debt stowed away in their closets…behind the skeletons. Here are some simple checks that you can do for free/cheaply, to confirm the credentials of those you are in business with:

  1. Check their details on Companies House (or your country’s equivalent)- Companies House is a database of all companies and LLPs  incorporated in the UK, type in the company name or company number and you get a whole load of information for free just like that. You can see their previous company names, their registered office address, their directors’ details, whether the business is still active, when their accounts were filed (or due) and a history of its filed documents. For a few pounds you can even obtain their latest filed accounts and judge their progress for yourself!
  2. Search for disqualified directors – You can do this on the Companies House register or on the Insolvency Service register (look up your country’s equivalent), these registers will tell you if a director of a company has been banned or disqualified from being a director (if the name pops up REPORT them, they tried to play you).
  3. Check the bankruptcy and insolvency register to see if an INDIVIDUAL is bankrupt OR the register of insolvent companies to see if a company is insolvent (bust).
  4. Check their website – Does it look comprehensive? Are there any TESTIMONIALS from their clients? Does it show who is behind the business? What is their mission statement? Where are they based? Do they provide contact details?
  5. Go with your gut – Finally, what does your gut feeling tell you about the company/person? If you have any suspicions or you are uncomfortable dealing with the company/person, walk away and take your business elsewhere.

In the legal profession we call the above DUE DILIGENCE and it is a process we undergo to verify OUR OWN clients (although there are further, more thorough requirements, such as passport copies and knowing who the shareholders are etc). It is a good habit to get into. Even better, keep a record that you checked these companies/people out – if your business blows up and your lender requires an audit before increasing your loan, you will thank yourself that you kept some evidence of your good business practice.

Please like and please share!

Filing for bankruptcy when you don’t have a cent!

Posted on by thelegalknow

thrid post

So I’m sure most of us have read that a certain famous rapper has filed for bankruptcy in the US. His lawyers are assuring the world that it’s just business as usual HOWEVER sadly that wouldn’t really be the case if you were made bankrupt in the UK. Here’s a quick post to clarify what bankruptcy means under UK law.

To be made bankrupt, a court has to issue a bankruptcy order against you. This can happen in 3 ways:

  • you apply to the court  because you are unable to pay your debts and want to declare yourself bankrupt;
  • your creditors (the people you owe money to) apply to make you bankrupt if you owe them £750 or more (yup as little as that); or
  • an insolvency practitioner applies to make you bankrupt because you broke the terms of your Individual Voluntary Arrangement (an agreement with your creditors to pay all or part of your debts, the insolvency practitioner manages the payments you make under the agreement).

If any of the above occurs, the Court will issue a bankruptcy order and the following will take place:

  • you will receive a copy of the bankruptcy order and may be interviewed about your situation (this helps the Court to determine what assets you have to pay your creditors);
  • your assets will be used to pay your debts (this could include your car, your income and your home although there are circumstances when assets are exempt, such as items of equipment which you need to use personally in your employment or business);
  • you will have to follow rules called ‘bankruptcy restrictions’ (these rules, amongst other things, stop you from borrowing more than £500 without telling the lender you’re bankrupt, acting as a director of a company, and creating, managing or promoting a company without the Court’s permission); and
  • your name and details will be published on a bankruptcy register called the ‘Individual Insolvency Register’.

After 12 months you’re usually released from your bankruptcy restrictions and debts. It seems grim but sometimes bankruptcy is a way for individuals to get their finances back on track. Bankruptcy only applies to individuals. Limited companies that can’t pay their creditors are ‘insolvent’ and can face compulsory liquidation which is a topic for another post.

Please like and please share!

One thing every business should do!

Posted on by thelegalknow

second post

As you know, I’m a lawyer so I cannot give financial advice. Even the legal tips that I give in this blog cannot be relied on in place of the lawyer/client relationship (I’m merely here to inform you so that you are legally empowered and not legally enslaved). HOWEVER I have no caveat for what I’m about to tell you. There is one thing that every business should most certainly do and that is …..GET INSURANCE!

Lawyers try to help you achieve good results but we also consider from the outset what could go wrong and often there is no better solution than being able to fall back on a good old insurance policy. Have a think about what your business/start up/trade is most at risk from and take a considered look in the market to see if you can get an insurance policy to protect against that risk.

Please like and please share!